fix(ai-security-guard): 移除Suggestion=block的兜底逻辑,改为基于阈值判断 || fix(ai-security-guard): Remove the cover-up logic of Suggestion=block and change it to based on threshold judgment (#3731)

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
JianweiWang
2026-04-17 14:42:22 +08:00
committed by GitHub
parent 94b40aab9a
commit 9128cbf729
5 changed files with 85 additions and 69 deletions

View File

@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ func TestTC_EVAL_001(t *testing.T) {
require.Equal(t, RiskMask, result)
}
// TestTC_EVAL_002 同上但 Suggestion=block => RiskBlock
// TestTC_EVAL_002 Suggestion=block but level below threshold => RiskPass
func TestTC_EVAL_002(t *testing.T) {
config := baseConfig()
config.SensitiveDataAction = "mask"
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ func TestTC_EVAL_002(t *testing.T) {
}
result := EvaluateRisk(MultiModalGuard, data, config, "")
require.Equal(t, RiskBlock, result)
require.Equal(t, RiskPass, result)
}
// TestTC_EVAL_003 promptAttackAction=block 且该维度超阈值 => RiskBlock
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ func TestTC_EVAL_013(t *testing.T) {
require.Equal(t, RiskMask, result)
}
// TestTC_EVAL_014 未知维度 Detail.Type=maliciousFile 且 Suggestion=block => RiskBlock
// TestTC_EVAL_014 未知维度 Detail.Type=maliciousFile 无阈值配置 => RiskPass
func TestTC_EVAL_014(t *testing.T) {
config := baseConfig()
@@ -339,16 +339,16 @@ func TestTC_EVAL_014(t *testing.T) {
}
result := EvaluateRisk(MultiModalGuard, data, config, "")
require.Equal(t, RiskBlock, result)
require.Equal(t, RiskPass, result)
}
// TestTC_EVAL_015 Detail 不触发拦截,但 Data.Suggestion=block => RiskBlock
// TestTC_EVAL_015 Detail level below threshold, data.Suggestion=block ignored => RiskPass
func TestTC_EVAL_015(t *testing.T) {
config := baseConfig()
data := Data{
RiskLevel: "none",
Suggestion: "block", // 兜底
Suggestion: "block",
Detail: []Detail{
{
Suggestion: "pass",
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ func TestTC_EVAL_015(t *testing.T) {
}
result := EvaluateRisk(MultiModalGuard, data, config, "")
require.Equal(t, RiskBlock, result)
require.Equal(t, RiskPass, result)
}
// TestTC_EVAL_016 Data.Suggestion=mask 但无 sensitiveData 脱敏明细 => 不返回 RiskMask
@@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ func TestTC_EVAL_018(t *testing.T) {
result := EvaluateRisk(MultiModalGuardForBase64, data, config, "")
require.Equal(t, RiskMask, result)
// block 场景
// block scenario: level=high but threshold=max => RiskPass
data2 := Data{
RiskLevel: "none",
Detail: []Detail{
@@ -543,21 +543,21 @@ func TestTC_EVAL_018(t *testing.T) {
},
}
result2 := EvaluateRisk(MultiModalGuardForBase64, data2, config, "")
require.Equal(t, RiskBlock, result2)
require.Equal(t, RiskPass, result2)
}
// TestTC_EVAL_019 空 Detail 列表 + Data.Suggestion=block => RiskBlock
// TestTC_EVAL_019 空 Detail 列表 + Data.Suggestion=block => RiskPass (threshold not exceeded)
func TestTC_EVAL_019(t *testing.T) {
config := baseConfig()
data := Data{
RiskLevel: "none",
Suggestion: "block",
Detail: []Detail{}, // 空 Detail 列表
Detail: []Detail{},
}
result := EvaluateRisk(MultiModalGuard, data, config, "")
require.Equal(t, RiskBlock, result)
require.Equal(t, RiskPass, result)
}
// TestTC_EVAL_020 空 Detail 列表 + 无 Data.Suggestion => RiskPass
@@ -787,15 +787,16 @@ func TestTC_EVAL_027(t *testing.T) {
require.Equal(t, RiskBlock, result2)
}
// TestTC_EVAL_028 Data.Suggestion=block 兜底 + 有 mask 候选 => RiskBlock
// block 兜底优先于 mask 候选
// TestTC_EVAL_028 Data.Suggestion=block does NOT override threshold checks.
// Detail level S1 < threshold S4, so the request should pass even though
// the top-level Suggestion is "block".
func TestTC_EVAL_028(t *testing.T) {
config := baseConfig()
config.SensitiveDataAction = "mask"
data := Data{
RiskLevel: "none",
Suggestion: "block", // 兜底 block
Suggestion: "block",
Detail: []Detail{
{
Suggestion: "mask",
@@ -807,7 +808,7 @@ func TestTC_EVAL_028(t *testing.T) {
}
result := EvaluateRisk(MultiModalGuard, data, config, "")
require.Equal(t, RiskBlock, result)
require.Equal(t, RiskPass, result)
}
// TestTC_DESENS_005 Detail.Result 为空数组 => 返回空字符串